From owner-mint@fishpool.com Fri Apr 18 12:36:31 2003 Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:13:17 +0200 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] TOSgroup.org Message-ID: <20030418101317.GB1522@tubul.dascon.de> Mail-Followup-To: rincewind@a-tuin.dascon.de, mint@lists.fishpool.fi References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-message-flag: Greetings from Aachen, Germany! Importance: High User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Michael Schwingen Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: rincewind@a-tuin.dascon.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Arnaud BERCEGEAY wrote: > Hello, > > I've learn the existence of TORGs this week-end ! > > How can TORG standards become real standards if the tosgroup.org team > doesn't speak more about their work ! > > For example, the TORG 105 about mouse wheel have an impact on > - AES (XaAES) > - AES bindings ([m]gemlib) > - high gem libraries (cflib, windom, ...) It also has impact on BIOS and VDI if we want to implement wheel support in the ROM TOS - like I did on the Milan. That's why I did not use the TORG method: is was impossible to implement that in a useful way. cu Michael