From owner-mint@fishpool.com Sat Apr 26 10:54:14 2003 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20030426105206.00ac6618@pop.utbm.fr> X-Sender: olandema@pop.utbm.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:54:05 +0200 To: mint@fishpool.com From: olivier landemarre Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES bugs ? In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.2.20030425183201.00ada270@pop.utbm.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by prinz.cs.uni-magdeburg.de id h3Q8sFd27832 A 19:27 25/04/2003 +0200, Standa Opichal a écrit : >Hi! > >On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, olivier landemarre wrote: > > > >on the previous (or next) field. In facts, the pointer is > > >never erased, and remains inactive on the previous field. > > >objc_edit(...,ED_END) should erase the pointer, but is > > >doesn't. That is bad ... > > > > This is corrected by Eric Reboux in source I send to Petr that send it to > > standa > >Correct. And neither me or anyone else did find the time for this so far >unfortunately. Thing would have been much easier if you used the CVS code >and sent the patch against that. This way it is pretty dirty work taking >too much time. Yes I know!!! It take a lot of time it's why I stop work on it, for sometime a result not very good! (you know this you correct somewhere and in an other part it's stop too work, it's a very hard project to do, to hard for me) Olivier