From owner-mint@fishpool.com  Fri Apr 25 19:29:08 2003
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 19:27:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>
X-X-Sender: stop@mail.idoox.com
To: olivier landemarre <olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr>
cc: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES bugs ?
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20030425183201.00ada270@pop.utbm.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304251925040.23625-100000@mail.idoox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS
Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: opichals@seznam.cz
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>

Hi!

On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, olivier landemarre wrote:

> >on the previous (or next) field. In facts, the pointer is
> >never erased, and remains inactive on the previous field.
> >objc_edit(...,ED_END) should erase the pointer, but is
> >doesn't. That is bad ...
> 
> This is corrected by Eric Reboux in source I send to Petr that send it to 
> standa

Correct. And neither me or anyone else did find the time for this so far 
unfortunately. Thing would have been much easier if you used the CVS code 
and sent the patch against that. This way it is pretty dirty work taking 
too much time.

best regards

STan