From owner-mint@fishpool.com Fri May 30 17:36:50 2003 Subject: Re: [MiNT] Kernel tests From: "Joakim H=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=F6gberg"?= To: mint@fishpool.com Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 17:34:08 +0200 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: gokmase@home.se MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1054308848.5bf80d40gokmase@home.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: gokmase@home.se Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by prinz.cs.uni-magdeburg.de id h4UFbPd18567 -----Original Message----- From: "Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" To: "mint@fishpool.com" Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:25:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [MiNT] Kernel tests >Simply accept the new feature as being useful for >someone, even if you >yourself think it is a "nonsense". I never suggested it was nonsense, just that I don't find that the implementation is ideal. It would seem neater to have it launched through a config, but I am not trying to start WW3 here. >BTW. the XFS/XDD modules are loaded without being >specified in any config >too. Just FYI, these are programs as well. Yes, but that does make some sense, as these are modules loaded, and are loaded as they have a certain file extention (XDD, etc). Just my 2 cents. >> I don't really see a point with it tbh, so having it built-in by default >> seem a bit unnecessary. >You can always compile the kernel without the shell. >It saves about 8k of >the kernel length, and you will have to reboot to TOS I'll see if someone will want to compile one for me then. Regards, Joakim