From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Mon Nov 24 11:31:30 2003 Message-ID: <3FC1DD03.1080603@rhrk.uni-kl.de> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:27:15 +0100 From: Matthias Alles User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031024 Debian/1.5-2 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MiNT Mailing List Subject: Re: [MiNT] 030-version of gcc References: <3FBD2E32.90809@rhrk.uni-kl.de> <3FBD3425.8070405@lutece.net> <3FBE19BD.7040506@lutece.net> <3FBE3D6C.3020904@lutece.net> <3FBFA9CA.9060902@lutece.net> <3FC091F0.9040500@lutece.net> <3FC0A2C0.1060906@lutece.net> <3FC12A38.6050200@rhrk.uni-kl.de> <3FC1384C.7080102@lutece.net> In-Reply-To: <3FC1384C.7080102@lutece.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: alles@rhrk.uni-kl.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: Salut! > Well I don't really need the whole package to be rebuilt. It is a > tremendous job that has already been done. The CC1 is enough for me ... > You may be able to do it, since you've done it for GCC 2.95.3 ... > Tell me ... Well, I will try it. I was only able to compile the 030-version of gcc 2.95.3 because of Frank`s help. But I guess, it will be no big difference to compile gcc3.3 with the Patch of Patrice. Which processor version do you wish? BTW: I also made a 060-version of the 2.95.3. You can get it here: www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~alles/gcc060.tgz So far it is untested. Regards, Matthias