From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Sat Nov 29 14:49:23 2003 Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:43:58 +0100 (CET) From: Frank Naumann X-X-Sender: fnaumann@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] Comments on the freemint todo.txt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Spam-Report: ---- Start SpamAssassin results -4.9 points, 5.0 required; -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-Scan-Signature: b1e41a8be4d617e80ccb9178295dc53c Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: fnaumann@cs.uni-magdeburg.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: Hello! > argument against integrating it. Same goes for audio devices. Is there > something I've missed? Why integrate these XDDs? I think that as a rule, > NEVER integrate hardware-drivers into the kernel. Or am I wrong? I don't see which part of the todo.txt do you mean. At least you may understand 'integrate' wrong (I already noticed that my understanding of integration is sometimes different from other people). E.g I mean with integration it's in the cvs and in sync with the current development and use the recommended interfaces. I don't mean linking into one binary. Ciao ...Frank -- ATARI FALCON 040 // MILAN 060 ----------------------------------------- http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/ e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de