From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Wed Dec 10 15:42:38 2003 To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] Shutdown() discussion Date: 09 Dec 2003 15:28:28 From: "Adam Klobukowski" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 In-Reply-To: <1071059984.3fd714106cd29@imp4-a.free.fr> X-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Marijuana Mail 0.1.67n [pl] (Atari Falcon 030; TOS 4.04 & MiNT / NVDI 5.01) Message-Id: <20031210142605.00B3935552@komp7.euh-e.edu.pl> Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: atari@gabo.pl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by prinz.cs.uni-magdeburg.de id hBAEgX014522 > Selon Petr Stehlik : > > > *However* I see now that natfeat is also to be accepted on real > > machines, ?? what real machines are going to accept it? > > I was kidding when I wrote that we could support natfeat on CT60. I > hope nobody took this seriously. O, but the _real_ subject of how Shutdown() should behave was missed. I once again ask you. Please read my previoust post about proposals how Shutdown() should behave. Short: On machines that can Poweroff, Halt, means Poweroff, only in debug mode Halt means really Halt. Pros: comptibility with other OSes/platforms (Linux atleast). Cons: no Halt if no in debug mode. Everyone, please state your opinion about it. Not where and when it should work, but _how_. At this time I know only one opinion, mine opinion and I'm willing to tweak kernel to satisfy my needs ;) Aditionally I'm thinking about introducing new #define into kernel: CT60, marking CT60 only code, on by default. That brings possibility to #define also ARAnyM for ARAnyM code off by default. Does that makes everyone happy? -- Semper Fidelis Adam Klobukowski atari@gabo.pl