From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Fri Dec 12 10:32:41 2003 Message-ID: <3FD9881D.6000700@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:19:25 +0100 From: guillaumed@users.sourceforge.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: fr-fr, fr, en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] Toswin2 Bugs References: <1069608224.6038.7.camel@llama> <121750987.20031127003402@der-ingo.de> In-Reply-To: <121750987.20031127003402@der-ingo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: guillaumed@users.sourceforge.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: Ingo Schmidt wrote: > Hi! > > MD> I'd like to volunteer to attempt to fix toswin2 bugs > > That is GREAT! I think there are lot of issues with Toswin2. Actually > it is great, but I there are a lot of things that could/should be > changed/fixed/added: Perhaps Toswin2 should be added to the FreeMiNT bugtracker??? And perhaps the bugtracker bugs' changes could be sent to the MiNT-mailing list, as Bugzilla does?