From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de  Thu Dec 11 15:07:11 2003
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:03:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Milan Jurik <M.Jurik@sh.cvut.cz>
To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Shutdown() discussion
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.58.0312111455510.17251@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312111501110.10994@bobek.sh.cvut.cz>
References: <BBFBBC93.3D91%gfabasic@hotmail.com>  <1071034718.3fd6b15e15223@imp2-l.free.fr>
  <001f01c3bef0$c01e3720$420963d9@blaszak>  <1071045922.754.9.camel@joy.sophics>
  <009f01c3bf91$b1b38040$eb0863d9@blaszak>  <1071134219.769.45.camel@joy.sophics>
  <Pine.NEB.4.58.0312111026490.17251@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> 
 <1071137372.743.58.camel@joy.sophics>  <Pine.NEB.4.58.0312111116220.17251@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
 <1071139002.769.69.camel@joy.sophics> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0312111338020.17251@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312111351080.10994@bobek.sh.cvut.cz>
 <Pine.NEB.4.58.0312111400230.17251@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312111404550.10994@bobek.sh.cvut.cz>
 <Pine.NEB.4.58.0312111424450.17251@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312111432240.10994@bobek.sh.cvut.cz>
 <Pine.NEB.4.58.0312111455510.17251@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at sh.cvut.cz
Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: M.Jurik@sh.cvut.cz
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>

Hi,

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Frank Naumann wrote:

> Hello!
>
> > > And where is the problem?
> > >
> > > I'm confused now. What is the problem we discuss here? What things should
> > > be reached and/or implemented?
> >
> > They are illegall (0x73xx)...
>
> ... I'm still confused ... :-)
>

Not a good idea to call illegall opcodes from user space :-) So, natfeats
need a clean API support in the kernel. A syscall.

>
> Ciao
>    ...Frank
>

Best regards,

         Milan Jurik