From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Thu Jan 8 23:29:51 2004 Message-ID: <3FFDD8F6.6010007@lutece.net> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 23:25:58 +0100 From: Francois LE COAT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNT, CT60 and power off References: <3FFD3954.4010601@lutece.net> <017401c3d5db$3780fc20$630963d9@blaszak> <3FFD6F65.2090805@lutece.net> <012601c3d60e$73bb8060$7a0d63d9@blaszak> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: lecoat@lutece.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: Hi, Frank Naumann wrote: > Btw. there are no different caches. It's just a matter of the strategy of > handling modified cache data (that can be set for each drive seperatly > to either write-through or write-back). Well then, to summarize my deep thoughts : you shouldn't have taken the good old GEMDOS TOSFS file system out from FreeMiNT. This is the only reliable file system. Its behavior is well known. There's many tools that enable to fix problems when it occurs. I can't trust in further developments without it. It's up to you to go where ever you want with the kernel. That's not my way, right ? Thanks Frank and Draco for your answers. Regards, -- Dr. François LE COAT Author of Eureka 2.12 (2D Graph Describer, 3D Modeller) http://eureka.atari.org