From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Mon Feb 9 22:09:48 2004 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 22:04:49 +0100 (CET) From: Milan Jurik To: mint@fishpool.com Cc: aranym@bobek.sh.cvut.cz Subject: Re: [MiNT] fVDI issues In-Reply-To: <20040209200828.GA11523@haddock.cd.chalmers.se> Message-ID: References: <20040122144133.GC17739@haddock.cd.chalmers.se> <00d401c3e198$9a156d80$0e0a63d9@blaszak> <20040123192814.GB28238@haddock.cd.chalmers.se> <003901c3ef33$276c85e0$dd0863d9@blaszak> <20040209200828.GA11523@haddock.cd.chalmers.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at sh.cvut.cz Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: M.Jurik@sh.cvut.cz Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: Hi, you can probably use natfeat "DEBUGPRINTF". Joy, why did you remove something and nobody knows it? Btw. a documentation (a list of natfeats) is still very bad :-( Johan and Konrad, sorry. Joy is very busy and he works on many things simultaneously. Best regars, Milan Jurik On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Johan Klockars wrote: > > > By default, Cconws to the screen is used, which would perhaps run into > ... > > > port. Or, perhaps even better, to the ARAnyM console (via NatFeat). > > > > Well, I finally had an occasion to do it. I set debug device to -1 and > > uncommented the "debug" directive inside the fvdi.sys. The result: > > > > FATAL: EMUL_OP called with bogus opcode 00007135 > > Apparently support for the 0x7135 (M68K_EMUL_OP_DEBUGUTIL) illegal > instruction handler has been removed from ARAnyM (on December 15, 2003, > according to the CVS). > The definition is commented out in the current version of emul_op.h. :-( > > > Ideas? > > The fVDI engine needs to be modified and recompiled. > It looks like it should be possible to use 0x712a (M68K_EMUL_OP_PUT_SCRAP) > to do the same job. > > These special illegal instructions really should have a bit more > descriptive names, IMO. ;-) > It's not exactly obvious that DEBUGUTIL is a console text output > function, or that PUT_SCRAP is a limited character by character > console VT52 output function. > > -- > Chalmers University | Why are these | e-mail: rand@cd.chalmers.se > of Technology | .signatures | > | so hard to do | WWW: http://www.klockars.net > Gothenburg, Sweden | well? | (fVDI, MGIFv5, QLem) > > >