From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Mon Jul 12 11:29:06 2004 Subject: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS From: Petr Stehlik To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi In-Reply-To: References: <001901c46765$e7997c10$680863d9@blaszak> <018901c467a1$a3a85490$4f0863d9@blaszak> <40F23DFF.4050403@seznam.cz> <40F24441.6020709@seznam.cz> <40F24B09.20503@seznam.cz> <40F250B2.4060307@seznam.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Message-Id: <1089624156.26855.39.camel@joy.sophics> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:22:36 +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at sophics.cz X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at fishpool.fi Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joy@sophics.cz Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by prinz.cs.uni-magdeburg.de id i6C9SpvL009298 V Po, 12. 07. 2004 v 11:07, Frank Naumann píše: > > I don't really know whether it is documented, but once it works that way. I > > think we can follow that to gain more compatibility. > > Opinions? I'd suggest to write a simple test case and run it quickly on all TOS versions (using STonX and ARAnyM it can be tested on anything from TOS 1.0 to TOS 4.0.4 in few minutes, with the exception of TOS 3.x that should be same as TOS 2.x). If there is a consistent behavior in all TOS versions then I'd be for implementing it in MiNT as well. Petr