From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Tue Jul 27 18:12:49 2004 Message-ID: <41067F2F.3020807@utbm.fr> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:13:35 +0200 From: Olivier Landemarre User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Naumann CC: MiNT Mailing List Subject: Re: [MiNT] xaaes: benchmarktest old vs new ? References: <1090699911.2298.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4104DCF1.1030600@utbm.fr> <4104EEC4.4060206@utbm.fr> <410614E8.2000909@utbm.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: Score: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on portail1.utbm.fr X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at fishpool.fi Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel > > >> I'm a little bit surprising from MyAeS perf because It should be >> worst than XAAES, because it's a server and run always, > > > As Kronos don't benchmark AES it's very unlikely that you see a > significant time consumption of an idle AES system on a fast machine > (as long the AES is clever enough to free the CPU from time to time :-)) yes I'm agree (but the CPU part of Aranym without JIT is already twice slower than my MagicMac on PM8600 at 300Mhz, it's near a Milan 40 computer), I have test with MMU option 10 time slower, I have find diffrence! but not so much (XAAES : 58, MyAeS : 55) It's like I thought, so I'm confort with Kronos test. Olivier > > >