From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Tue Aug 10 23:07:30 2004 Message-ID: <1092171657.41193789de905@imp3-q.free.fr> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:00:57 +0200 From: Xavier Joubert To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] Coreutils References: <1092165758.6817.10.camel@pikachu.atari-source.com> In-Reply-To: <1092165758.6817.10.camel@pikachu.atari-source.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.4 X-Originating-IP: 213.101.226.62 Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: xavier.joubert@free.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by prinz.cs.uni-magdeburg.de id i7AL7G6r026429 Hello Mark, Selon Mark Duckworth : > So let me know what you guys think of this and which direction we should > go. I for the most part went ahead with this because my rpms were > failing on stuff like mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/{stuff,temp,things} where > instead of creating the dirs separately it would literally create the > dir "{stuff,temp,things}". It's kind of strange since mkdir didn't do > it outside of the rpm build process - leading me to believe we may have > absolutely no reason to upgrade. This shell code is bash specific and non-portable. It should be avoided in specfiles. If you want/need to fix this, please check your system configuration. /bin/sh is probably not bash (pdksh ? ash ?), or RPM is configured to use another path. Best regards, Xavier