From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Wed Aug 11 11:17:01 2004 Subject: Re: [MiNT] Loadable libraries urgently needed From: Petr Stehlik To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi In-Reply-To: References: <1092165758.6817.10.camel@pikachu.atari-source.com> <20040810231619.7b63c158.mandin.patrice@wanadoo.fr> <4119CD6F.4040601@seznam.cz> <20040811104240.32fe518b.mandin.patrice@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Message-Id: <1092215114.4037.26.camel@joy.sophics> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:05:14 +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at sophics.cz Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joy@sophics.cz Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by prinz.cs.uni-magdeburg.de id i7B9GlXk012158 V St, 11. 08. 2004 v 10:56, Frank Naumann píše: > > As you say, we don't reduce memory usage, so in memory it is not worse > > than current situation. However, we reduce disk space, and avoid > > recompilation when a library change: Do you recompile all the binaries RPM > > when the mintlib is updated ? So from my point of view, this would be a > > progress over current situation. > > This is for sure true and a big advantage. I don't wanted to stop > something, just wanted to clarify that memory consumption don't get > better. Performance will be increase too I think And it will even make our numerous ST users happy as this solution doesn't require neither MMU nor 68020+. Petr