From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Sat Aug 7 08:49:44 2004 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 08:44:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Frank Naumann X-X-Sender: fnaumann@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de To: mint_list Subject: Re: [MiNT] 1.16.0 still no go In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Spam-Report: ---- Start SpamAssassin results -4.9 points, 5.0 required; -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-Scan-Signature: 8f557e09c6f25d1c731b1614156185f1 Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: fnaumann@cs.uni-magdeburg.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel Hello! > What I saw on my screen when trying to unpack these things was: > > gzip: freemint-1.16.0-beta.tar.gz: invalid compressed data--format violated What's why for every file of the 1.16.0 beta release an .md5 file exist that hold the md5 checksum. Just calculate the md5 checksum of the download file and compare to see if the files are really identical (with md5sum , part of textutils package). > So, will somebody please look at those kernel files on the Sparemint site? I > think there are some problems there. These files are definitly ok. Are you sure you downloaded them correctly as binary? Regards, Frank -- ATARI FALCON 060 // MILAN 060 ----------------------------------------- http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/ e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de