From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Wed Aug 25 22:15:16 2004 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:11:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Frank Naumann X-X-Sender: fnaumann@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de To: Mint ML Subject: Re: [MiNT] GCC 3.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <412BEA4A.3080204@yahoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Spam-Report: ---- Start SpamAssassin results -4.9 points, 5.0 required; -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-Scan-Signature: b1e41a8be4d617e80ccb9178295dc53c Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: fnaumann@cs.uni-magdeburg.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel Hello! > I have a question: is it possible to have both gcc 2.95 and gcc 3 installed > on the same machine, without conflict ? Yes, you just need to decide which is the default compiler (gcc). > IIRC, C++ libraries compiled with gcc 2.95 are not compatible with C++ > library for gcc 3 (and vice versa). The libraries of the gcc are not the problem (there is no conflict due to version numbers and symlinks). If you decide for gcc3 as default compiler you need to update all C++ libraries of the system. Regards, Frank -- ATARI FALCON 060 // MILAN 060 ----------------------------------------- http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/ e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de