From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Thu Sep 23 22:08:13 2004 Subject: Re: [MiNT] Current Binaries From: Mark Duckworth To: Frank Naumann Cc: mint@fishpool.com In-Reply-To: References: <41518310.9050502@lutece.net> <4152E99C.1040808@lutece.net> <4152FE43.7000609@lutece.net> <41532529.4070707@seznam.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:01:13 -0400 Message-Id: <1095969673.9066.5.camel@pikachu.atari-source.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: mduckworth@atari-source.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 21:57 +0200, Frank Naumann wrote: > Hello! > > > Is it something we don't have resources for or what is the problem to provide > > snapshots from say past 10 days of everything in the cvs (all in debug and > > release versions to let others be able to report problems and debug easier). > > I wonder why don't you support this idea. It makes much sense. We would get > > more feedback this way. > > Sure, but I already maintain lot of things. This is an additional thing > that will consume much time (even if it's automated). So for me it's very > hard to activly support it. > I have no problem doing this. It falls very closely under the duties I have already undertaken involving freemint. I can make an automated build script in only a few days. Heck I could even use a cross compiler to get this done on the server itself ;-) Just have to make sure mintlib, gemlib and the other tools are up to date on the cross distribution. Thanks, -- Mark Duckworth