From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Mon Sep 13 09:19:20 2004 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1994F63A-0553-11D9-AA5A-00039357F826@epfl.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Philipp_Donz=E9?= Subject: [MiNT] MiNTlib and FreeMiNT Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:04:05 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: philipp.donze@epfl.ch Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel Hi, I tried to compile FreeMiNT kernel using my GCC 3.3.3. It appears as if there is the same "asm clobber list" problem. I.e. there exists "sys/mint/falcon.h" file with lots of assembler code. IMO it seams as if this file is the same as the file "mint/falcon.h" which is part of MiNTlib. Am I right? Why are there 2 versions of the same file in 2 different packages. Can I replace the file of FreeMiNT package by the file of MiNTlib package? (There are minor differences in these files: VsetMode vs. Vsetmode, VsetScreen vs. Vsetscreen, VgetMonitor vs. Montype(), Validmode missing in one) Which one is the more accurate one? (I'm using for both packages latest CVS version.) Philipp