From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Thu Sep 2 21:37:50 2004 Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:01:56 +0200 From: "=?iso-8859-1?B?Sm9ha2ltIEj2Z2Jlcmc=?=" Reply-To: gokmase@home.se To: "mint@fishpool.com" Subject: Re: [MiNT] FreeMiNT 1.16 - have you all switched yet? X-mailer: Foxmail 5.0 [en] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040902150141.DF67437B@lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at spray.net Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-Approved-By: tjhukkan@fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: gokmase@spray.se Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel Hiya. >>> the last thing that really ticked me off ;-) Now we just need >>> non-proportional fonts as system font and I'll be quite pleased ;-) > >I don't think that this is best idea. There is lot of apps with RSC which >is not suitable for proportional font. But maybe it is just my feeling. I have the same feeling, a proportional font might cause many apps to look a bit quirky. Perhaps a possibility to use a proportional font for menu bar, window titles, etc, while using a monospaced font for rendering RSC objects? Could be cool Not that it should have any priority at all at this point in time though, if you ask me :) There are of course other things of much greater importance still missing or not working 100% right, just have a look in bug tracker :) Regards, Joakim