From fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de Fri Sep 24 17:39:30 2004 Message-ID: <41543CAE.6060307@seznam.cz> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:26:38 -0400 From: Standa Opichal User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] Automated CVS Builds References: <1096003205.537.5.camel@localhost> <41543BC1.4070809@seznam.cz> In-Reply-To: <41543BC1.4070809@seznam.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: mint@fishpool.com Delivered-To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: opichals@seznam.cz Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-ID: X-List-ID: X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel X-Milter: ClamAV 0.70/0.70kjel X-Milter: milter-regex 1.5jel But... keep the manual build aside because if you are about to cross-compile then it is not possible with RPM (and it takes just minutes to crosscompile the whole CVS). regards STanda Standa Opichal wrote: > Hey! > > Great! Time to create the RPM spec file for that all I guess to not to > have this kind of dillema any more. And it is in the TODO file I > think... It should not be that hard. > > Proposal: Establish a build number counter which would serve us as the > extra version postfix. You can install the RPM than without any further > affects to your system with this. > > Standa > > > Mark Duckworth wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> Well good news. I made an automated build script. freemint, xaaes, and >> all toos + mintlib only takes about 3 hours to build on my falcon so I >> can run a job at 8am or whatever when I KNOW I'll be sleeping. >> >> I set up my ssh keys so it auto-uploads to the server but now I'm >> approaching a dillema. Do I just tar up the build directories as they >> stand after building and let the user sort it out or do I script out >> picking through files and assembling a proper binary distribution of >> each? >> >> Thanks, >> Mark >> >> >> >> >