From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Oct 14 16:50:14 2004 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de From: Henk Robbers To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] mouse wheel support in xaaes Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:27:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200410120014.12221.h.robbers@chello.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410141727.05085.h.robbers@chello.nl> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: h.robbers@chello.nl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.2 tagged_above=-50.5 required=3.8 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100, RAZOR2_CHECK, RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES On Wednesday 13 October 2004 22:16, Arnaud BERCEGEAY wrote: > Hello, > > > I actually used the wheel on my Milan/latest TOS4.8/XaAES 0.963. > > I've done a small utility "mouse wheel tester". It displays informations > when the MU_WHEEL event is received (MU_WHEEL should be received because > the window doesn't have slider). > > http://arnaud.bercegeay.free.fr/gemlib/tstwhlm.zip (117.186 bytes) > > Can someone with XaAES 0.963 (Henk?) test my program ? I haven't the right > system to test it. It works :-) However, not before I had to do tiny repairs to the functions XA_wheel_event() and wheel_arrow() in XA_EVENT.C of XaAES 963. The repairs concern the detection and handling of wheel events on windows without corresponding arrows (your program). Apparently I was happy with the default behaviour on windows with arrows for existing (non MU_WHEEL) programs. This behaviour really works. I think at that time I already considered quitting XaAES and just didnt test the rest properly. I also found that the priorities are different from what I remembered. Which means that activating arrows prevails over 'waiting_for(MU_WHEEL)'. But that shouldnt be difficult to change. I dont have a computer on which I can run GCC, so it is useless for me to get write access to the CVS. I can send the changed functions as they are now in 963+1 to anybody who is interested. Only 4 lines have changed, which I have marked. -- Groeten; Regards. Henk Robbers. mailto:h.robbers@chello.nl http://members.ams.chello.nl/h.robbers/Home.html Interactive disassembler: TT-Digger; http://digger.atari.org A Home Cooked teXt editor: AHCX