From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sat Dec 25 17:33:40 2004
X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Subject: [MiNT] Resources as Interface define them
From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>
Reply-To: ozk@atari.org
To: mint@fishpool.com
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 18:31:40 +0100
Message-Id: <1103995900.3807.5.camel@fedora>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1 (2.0.1-2) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: ozk@atari.org
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 tagged_above=-50.5 required=3.8 tests=AWL,
 BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_SORBS
X-Spam-Level: 


 Hi all,

 I'm wondering, would we benefit in anyway to support resource-files as
defined by Interface? I mean, any programs out there would use the AES's
rsrc_load() if bit 2 in ap_gout4 indicates Interface-style rsc-header
capability? If not, I dont think its worth implementing this, and rather
think it over before doing any extended rsc format implementation.
Opinions?

 Oh, and btw, Merry Xmas everyone! :-)

 Best regards,
Odd Skancke