From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Mar 31 23:48:44 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Subject: Re: [MiNT] New AES keyboard messages From: "Evan K. Langlois" To: Howard Chu Cc: Adam =?iso-8859-2?Q?K=B3obukowski?= , mint@fishpool.com In-Reply-To: <424C6842.3070206@highlandsun.com> References: <1111344400.12169.50.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> <424B0943.3000706@gabo.pl> <1112242300.10960.20.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> <424B8F47.7040803@gabo.pl> <1112294969.24071.20.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> <424C65AA.9070900@gabo.pl> <424C6842.3070206@highlandsun.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-4+OGy2XVOKZP1m4SwBJA" Organization: Cool Running Concepts Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:46:15 -0600 Message-Id: <1112305577.24071.55.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc14.midphase.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - fishpool.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - CoolRunningConcepts.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Level: --=-4+OGy2XVOKZP1m4SwBJA Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 13:14 -0800, Howard Chu wrote: > I think Evan has already demonstrated that he's unqualified to render > meaningful design feedback. Just ignore him for now, maybe in a few > years when he actually has a clue he could offer something useful. I'm unqualified because I don't agree with you? Love you too! Just so I can not agree with you, how about you post your idea on solving the problem! Be constructive instead of just bashing. We really don't need personal attacks. Thanks, Evan --=-4+OGy2XVOKZP1m4SwBJA Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 13:14 -0800, Howard Chu wrote:

I think Evan has already demonstrated that he's unqualified to render 
meaningful design feedback. Just ignore him for now, maybe in a few 
years when he actually has a clue he could offer something useful.

I'm unqualified because I don't agree with you? Love you too!

Just so I can not agree with you, how about you post your idea on solving the problem! Be constructive instead of just bashing. We really don't need personal attacks.

Thanks,
Evan --=-4+OGy2XVOKZP1m4SwBJA--