From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Mar 16 16:07:04 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:01:53 +0100 From: mikro To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] Cross Compiler Message-ID: <20050316150153.GA15221@hysteria.sk> References: <1110957748.9126.62.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> <20050316105445.108f32ad.mandin.patrice@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: mikro@hysteria.sk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: > No, you understand me wrong. It's just a lot of work and until gcc 3.3 the > compiler was not in such a stable state that the work was worthwhile. > btw how it's with newer version of 2.95? If I remember correctly, cross-mint stuff at sparemint site contains 2.95.1 and FreeMiNT some newer version. I know, there are probably no big differences, I'm just curious why we use still that old version for cross-compiling. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- MiKRO Atari XE/XL/Mega STE/Falcon060 http://mikro.atari.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------------