From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Thu Mar 31 23:18:28 2005
X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Message-ID: <424C6842.3070206@highlandsun.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:14:42 -0800
From: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050318
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?QWRhbSBLxYJvYnVrb3dza2k=?= <atari@gabo.pl>
Cc: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] New AES keyboard messages
References: <1111344400.12169.50.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>	 <424B0943.3000706@gabo.pl>	 <1112242300.10960.20.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>	 <424B8F47.7040803@gabo.pl> <1112294969.24071.20.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> <424C65AA.90709
In-Reply-To: <424C65AA.9070900@gabo.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by highlandsun.propagation.net id j2VLEeLO012358
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: hyc@highlandsun.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level: 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de id j2VLISrP006862

Adam Kłobukowski wrote:
> Evan K. Langlois napisał(a):
> 
>> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 07:48 +0200, Adam Kłobukowski wrote:
>>
>>> That is the basic idea, but note that I wish that Shift, Control, Alt 
>>> to be reported like other keys, so application could know that Shift, 
>>> Alt, Control are pressed alone.

>> Oh yeah.  In the proposed hack^h^h^h^h "interface modification", the
>> KEYSTATE event would report the status of the "modifier" keys as well.
>> You wouldn't get the ascii equivalent, but you'd get the scancode in the
>> key portion and the status of the keys in the usual place, when they go
>> up or down. 

> Why do you call that solution a hack? Is there anything unclean here?

I think Evan has already demonstrated that he's unqualified to render 
meaningful design feedback. Just ignore him for now, maybe in a few 
years when he actually has a clue he could offer something useful.

-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
   http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
   Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support


