From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Tue Apr 19 20:24:56 2005
X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
Organization: Revee Creative Productions
To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] question about socket calls
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:21:48 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <BE89E3F4.12374%atari@bright.net>
In-Reply-To: <BE89E3F4.12374%atari@bright.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200504192021.48047.maurits@bassment.nu>
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: maurits@bassment.nu
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level: 

> Sorry, in my excitement I was up all night and failed to mention I was
> using gluestik.

I was going to ask whether your VNC client was for X or GEM, but if it's a 
STiK client I'm guessing GEM. Too cool! :o)

Wouldn't it be a good idea to use MiNTnet natively for this though? It will 
certainly be a lot faster and I don't think STiK users (you might still find 
them on some 1MB STs) will be likely to run VNC. And with native MiNTnet 
you'll know exactly where you are with regards to packet buffers etc.
 
> However, with all the chatter about CVS I remember know 
> gluestik is on the CVS, so I will look there.  ;-))

Hey so it WAS useful! :o)

Maurits.