From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat Apr 9 09:55:31 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:53:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Frank Naumann X-X-Sender: fnaumann@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] objc_draw() and other AES calls in userspace? In-Reply-To: <20050409003315.5858.qmail@mailcz.in.systinet.com> Message-ID: References: <20050408234812.2670.qmail@mailcz.in.systinet.com> <20050409003315.5858.qmail@mailcz.in.systinet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Scan-Signature: d860c0cb348da9e1061d1fa4651eafeb X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: fnaumann@boerde.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Hello! > OK, but how N.AES does this then (if true at all)? I don't now what N.AES do but it's for sure not clean and the way XaAES want to go. Regards, Frank -- ATARI FALCON 060 // MILAN 060 ----------------------------------------- http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/ e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de