From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon May 16 10:32:26 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES: Bug in shel_write? From: Odd Skancke Reply-To: ozk@atari.org To: MiNT List In-Reply-To: <7BECFCC4-51EF-11D9-8640-000D9356BAEE@epfl.ch> References: <7BECFCC4-51EF-11D9-8640-000D9356BAEE@epfl.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 10:24:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1116231899.22250.63.camel@fedora> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by smtp210.tiscali.dk id j4G8RZGJ033036 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: ozk@atari.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: * Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de id j4G8WQlw014367 søn, 19,.12.2004 kl. 19.55 +0100, skrev Philipp Donzé: > Hi, > > While debugging a little GEMJing demo application I realized that > shel_write(SWM_LAUNCH, GEMAPP, CL_PARSE, path, arg) > has an odd behaviour under current XaAES version: > It changes the current working directory of the parent process to point > to the directory of the launched child process. > I don't think this behaviour is documented somewhere. (Tell me if I'm > wrong.) Aha! This is a thing I fixed quite recently, actually. And now, going trough my mailbox, I see your posting about this and it reassures me that now it should be correct :) I wasnt sure if I corrected a noncorrect behaviour or uncorrected a correct one. I know that most problems regarding Toswin2/tw-call are gone now. Could those with knowledge look at line 198 in xa_shel.c and give feedback as to how correct this looks? Best Regards, Odd Skancke