From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Jun 17 19:24:41 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Subject: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow? From: Odd Skancke To: MiNT List In-Reply-To: <1118973980.15790.24.camel@linuxbox> References: <1118934446.15790.7.camel@linuxbox> <0007b541.01948d720389@smtp.t-online.de> <1118973980.15790.24.camel@linuxbox> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:20:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1119028842.15790.29.camel@linuxbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: ozk@atari.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Hello, Came to think of it .. what have you set your 'redraw_timeout' to? This is a timeout value XaAES uses to allow for clients to service its WM_REDRAWS. If all WM_REDRAWS are not serviced before this timeout, the clients that are being marked as "lagging" will have its WM_REDRAW queue reset and a full set of WM_REDRAWs are sent for each of its windows. Perhaps this is what happens here? Try to enlarge this value (I use a value of 2000 on the Milan, could be enough with 1000 on 060 Hades). Best regards, Odd Skancke