From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jun 21 07:46:59 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <42B7A9C8.1090305@gabo.pl> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:46:48 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Adam_K=B3obukowski?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MiNT List Subject: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow? References: <42B09A61.9020204@yahoo.fr> <1118887948.12057.11.camel@linuxbox> <42B18304.3030406@yahoo.fr> <1118934446.15790.7.camel@linuxbox> <42B1AEE7.3010707@yahoo.fr> <1119105225.15790.70.camel@linuxbox> <20050619015454.t7xyf5g6awisk0o4@coolrunningco In-Reply-To: <1119298313.15790.119.camel@linuxbox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: Gabo - system antywirusowy X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: atari@gabo.pl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: My two eurocents for this discussion... I've been using Zview both unde Xaaes and Naes on CT60 Falcon with 16MHz bus in 800x600x256 resolution. I havent oticed big differences (anything that woud 'pop' like 'wow.... thats odd'). On the other hand, I did not try hard... I think, a good thing to resolve this is to write a speciall benchmark for that, that will even emulate misbehaving applicationa (ie. slow or using AES in improper way). -- Semper Fidelis Adam Klobukowski atari@gabo.pl