From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Jul 27 21:15:14 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Subject: Re: [MiNT] binutils-2.13.2.1-2.m68kmint.rpm From: Evan Langlois To: mint@fishpool.com, Mark Duckworth In-Reply-To: <1122490093.17747.33.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> References: <1122318830.7695.11.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <200507252219.41056.maurits@bassment.nu> <1122382820.8216.14.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <1122396381.8216.37.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <1122397324.1374.13.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> <1122399338.8216.45.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <1122410796.1374.27.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> <1122411547.8216.55.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk> <1122414600.1374.33.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> <1122489526.32635.7.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> <1122490093.17747.33.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:11:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1122491505.32635.28.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc14.midphase.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - fishpool.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - CoolRunningConcepts.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:48 -0400, Mark Duckworth wrote: > Actually you just encouraged me to look around and indeed it's possible > but difficult through the use of macros. Now it seems another problem > could be that most linux distros use a version of rpm substantially > newer than ours. I tried to build a new rpm but got held up on > beecrypt. Maybe that problem has been resolved or worked around with > later versions. Has anyone tried porting a newer version? I wanted to use the version of rpm that comes with busybox to simplify things, but that version needs mmap() so that you can handle files bigger than RAM efficiently, and trying to write a work-around was just too frustrating - it goes back to needing a virtual address space to support a real mmap() to do it efficiently.