From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Wed Jul 27 21:10:05 2005
X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Subject: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow?
From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>
To: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
In-Reply-To: <42B09A61.9020204@yahoo.fr>
References: <42B09A61.9020204@yahoo.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:06:13 +0000
Message-Id: <1122498373.5660.523.camel@linuxbox>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: ozk@atari.org
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,
 BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level: 

ons, 15,.06.2005 kl. 23.15 +0200, skrev Zorro:
> Hi,
> 
> >From years, I use NAES 2.0.
> 
> I'm very happy with this one but some months ago, I heard that XAAES is
> very fast because now, it's a kernel modul. 
> 
> I wanted to try by myself with the binaries from CVS provided by
> "xaaes.atariforge.net" but I must acknowledge you that I am very
> disappointed.

 Did you get a chance to test a binary from the latest CVS? I think this
issue is fixed by now. Let me know if you want me to send you a test.
(involves new resourcefiles too, tho)


 Best Regards,
Odd Skancke