From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jul 12 02:07:45 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de X-Authentication-Warning: antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl: draco owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 02:06:15 +0200 (CEST) From: "Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" To: =?iso-8859-1?B?Sm9ha2ltIEj2Z2Jlcmc=?= Cc: Ingo Schmidt , Andreas Schwab , MiNT-Liste Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: replying to the mintlist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050712015858.B58252@antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: draco@obta.uw.edu.pl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: > Now, it is not like this is a big problem really, but I really fail to see the > harm in changing the list behaviour. There is a religion that worshippes the Holy-And-Untouchable-Mail-Header. Replacing the "Reply-To:" field is actually a sacrilege; if you do that, they come to your home at midnight to cut off your head. The additional traffic generated from such a behaviour of a list, i.e. the duplicated emails, are actual sacrifices offerred to the deity. We tolerate that, because we generally show respect to religions. -- Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz mail: draco@atari.org http://draco.atari.org ** Ea natura multitudinis est, ** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25) ************************************************************* ** Taka to juz natura pospolstwa, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie, ** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.