From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Jul 14 21:25:51 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gWtJHQu1kKbT8K/gLjJBdUZA+KazBXUYIVL5ZvDeqSuVQMWkbRaErvU+0lPoqZM6lxVrpSRvcUIlSlChLMlXqotH3Z8BTeF0VegAWS4edGph0D6oAC7LyoFD3so5DbWPQgjCcAvbzYZmAeDzBiDnUEFA05lwNYyFBDFE9xgDNNE= ; Message-ID: <20050714192337.5997.qmail@web31013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:23:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Frederic Fouche Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[3]: usage of wind_calc() To: mint In-Reply-To: <1121367603.16044.24.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-150356340-1121369017=:5564" X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: x130844@yahoo.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, FROM_WEBMAIL_END_NUMS6, HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Level: **** --0-150356340-1121369017=:5564 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Do you understand that your request is utopistic? How do you explain that big coorporations and thousands of developers are= not able to create the thing you wish? and consider that their customers= are MUCH more important than the Atari user base (money wise). They get = PISSED everytime they have to upgrade, for every upgrade (as tiny as it i= s), they have to test it for months to make sure it is not going to break= something else. The testing phase cost them MUCHO money everytime. =20 Show me an OS in the world that fulfill your requirements. Evan Langlois wrote: On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 20:28 +0200, YesCREW wrote: > Imho all the fuzz is funny. XaAES is and can introduce new things. That= s=20 > good! There are other AESes, other OSes and things called boot selector= s ;) > So i really dont understand all the fuss. Thats dumb user view here. Ap= reciate=20 > new stuff happening, altough im still on N.AES personaly.... I refuse to use a system that expects me to reboot and choose a different OS to run a different application. That simply isn't something that a well designed system does. If 1 AES, and 1 OS could run ALL your applications and you didn't need a bootselector, then that would be the proper goal right? So why haven't you switched to XaAES yet? =09 --------------------------------- Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page=20 --0-150356340-1121369017=:5564 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Do you understand that your request is utopistic?

How do you explain that big coorporations and thousands of devel= opers are not able to create the thing you wish? and consider that their = customers are MUCH more important than the Atari user base (money wise). = They get PISSED everytime they have to upgrade, for every upgrade (as tin= y as it is), they have to test it for months to make sure it is not going= to break something else. The testing phase cost them MUCHO money everyti= me.
 
Show me an OS in the world that fulfill your requirements.


Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>= wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 20:28 +0200, YesCRE= W wrote:
> Imho all the fuzz is funny. XaAES is and can introduce n= ew things. Thats
> good! There are other AESes, other OSes and thi= ngs called boot selectors ;)
> So i really dont understand all the = fuss. Thats dumb user view here. Apreciate
> new stuff happening, = altough im still on N.AES personaly....

I refuse to use a system t= hat expects me to reboot and choose a
different OS to run a different = application. That simply isn't
something that a well designed system d= oes.

If 1 AES, and 1 OS could run ALL your applications and you di= dn't need a
bootselector, then that would be the proper goal right? So= why haven't
you switched to XaAES yet?




Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page --0-150356340-1121369017=:5564--