From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Tue Jul 19 08:34:33 2005
X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Message-ID: <20050719023305.auf5aaropwn48go8@coolrunningconcepts.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:33:05 -0400
From: evan@coolrunningconcepts.com
To: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
Cc: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
References: 	<F6E60FAE8239614A97E6B60FDCB29A8F46D9DF@i2km86-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net>
	<200507190736.25602.maurits@bassment.nu>
	<20050719020114.hsv6q5xjt14w4wwo@coolrunningconcepts.com>
	<200507190816.44198.maurits@bassment.nu>
In-Reply-To: <200507190816.44198.maurits@bassment.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc14.midphase.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - fishpool.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32001 502] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - coolrunningconcepts.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: evan@coolrunningconcepts.com
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,
 BAYES_00, NO_REAL_NAME
X-Spam-Level: 

Quoting Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>:
> It does. It's this whole "unixy geeky" reputation that keeps people away from

Hopefully we can change that.

> MiNT. But the real underlying reason for the statistics is of course much
> easier: In the early 90s, MagiC was the easiest way to go and you only used
> MiNT if you had a special reason to. Nowadays, the few remaining Atarians

I've been using MiNT before there was a MagiC.   I remember when my MF30 died
and I got the 512MB SCSI drive .. never thought that could be filled up ever!

> just use their Atari nostalgicly and hence they are not going to change
> platforms on it now, no matter how nice EasyMiNT is (most don't even know it
> exists). SpareMiNT and EasyMiNT came too late to make a significant change in
> this.

It would take some really great apps that only work on MiNT/XaAES to cause the
change I think.  I was just wondering if there are specific features of MagiC
or  other issues that make it more attractive - things we could address.

> By the way, I don't know where this 50% statistic comes from but I wonder if
> it's accurate today; seeing the activity of developers on the MiNT side in
> recent years I'm starting to doubt it.

I don't believe its accurate either, but I'm hated enough already, so I don't
need to go disagreeing with statistics that I have no clue about at all.
Playing devils advocate doesn't get you many friends, but it does occasionally
make people think about the flip-sides of issues.


