From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Tue Jul 12 15:37:08 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <42D3C702.3070205@seznam.cz> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:34:58 -0400 From: Standa Opichal User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] [Mint-cvs] [FreeMiNT CVS] lib/gemlib Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: opichals@seznam.cz Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS X-Spam-Level: Hi! I am sorry for my ignorance, but has there been any discussion on these features to go to gemlib? I would rather see some sort of a consensus on each particular new extension of AES before it gets to the the only up-to-date library bindings. I think we all should attempt to repress our egoisms and work together. Not that I care myself about it too much, but rather I see it quite frankly wasted time. I know that sometimes it is better just to code it, but once a public API is the concern there should be some discussion and _conclusion_ first in my humble opinion. At the end... hmm, I don't actually understand why I care to write such mails... but I have it already written I will post it anyway. STanda cvs@atariforge.net wrote: > Update of /mint/lib/gemlib > In directory www.mahlert.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9363 > > Modified Files: > SRCFILES a_wind_get.c gem.h mt_gem.h.in > Added Files: > a_wind_xcreate.c a_wind_xcreate_grect.c > Log Message: > wind_xcreate() added.