From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Jul 25 01:04:06 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <42E41D0D.5040008@chello.nl> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:58:21 +0200 From: Henk Robbers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MiNT List Subject: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: h.robbers@chello.nl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: ** Arnaud BERCEGEAY wrote: > Hello, > >> I don't doubt it is a nice feature of Windom, but Windom ain't the >> only possible route to >> take when creating applications. > > > 100% Agree :) but if you are a C coder, then windom may help, that's > all. No requirement at all. > I dont use WINDOM. I developed my own system over the years. Creating a new GEM app for me has become already very easy. -- Groeten; Regards. Henk Robbers. mailto:h.robbers@chello.nl http://members.ams.chello.nl/h.robbers/Home.html Interactive disassembler: TT-Digger; http://digger.atari.org A Home Cooked teXt editor: AHCX