From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Jul 27 22:25:41 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <42E7ED7A.9010005@seznam.cz> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:24:26 -0400 From: Standa Opichal User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow? References: <42B09A61.9020204@yahoo.fr> <1122498373.5660.523.camel@linuxbox> <1122492068.17747.40.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> In-Reply-To: <1122492068.17747.40.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: opichals@seznam.cz Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Zorro, Can you perhaps create a new video capture for the current XaAES state to confirm? Thanks Standa Mark Duckworth wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 21:06 +0000, Odd Skancke wrote: > > >> Did you get a chance to test a binary from the latest CVS? I think this >>issue is fixed by now. Let me know if you want me to send you a test. >>(involves new resourcefiles too, tho) > > > Yeah, > > I think what's in CVS right now is freaking great. Ozk, maybe we could > make a new release for Xaaes.atariforge.net? It seems pretty stable and > now we're starting to add experimental features... and it's crazy fast. > Might be time to provide it to the people. And of course we should > package up a mint cvs kernel with it since that seems to be necessary. > > Thanks, > Mark