From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Jul 11 22:16:32 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:14:03 +0200 From: Ingo Schmidt X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) Professional Reply-To: Ingo Schmidt X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <981831656.20050711221403@der-ingo.de> To: MiNT-Liste Subject: [MiNT] Re[3]: usage of wind_calc() In-Reply-To: <1459271786.20050711221117@der-ingo.de> References: <200507110924.p64215@ll.maus.de> <1459271786.20050711221117@der-ingo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:58e864169f3ef71bae3e2b831e61e1a6 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: ich@der-ingo.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Hi all! > I have no idea. I've never meet this bug by myself : i use windom which > have a workaround for that kind of bug... ??? That is most mysterious! Why fix a bug that is not even there?! That seems nonsense to me. n.AES displays toolbars alright! XaAES has no problem with them. MagiC doesnt have any toolbars (as far as I know) So whats left? MyAES? Dont know that one. If it has a bug, it should be fixed in MyAES. It is still continued. Geneva? Does it have toolbars? So is that "workaround" for MagiC or what? Why are we talking about bugs that are not present and cannot be named? I dont get it. Maybe someone can explain so that even I understand.... Cheers, Ingo =;->> Cheers, Ingo =;->