From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Aug 14 20:15:41 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Subject: Re: [MiNT] Xaaes is slow From: Odd Skancke To: MiNT List In-Reply-To: <42FF8098.2090001@gabo.pl> References: <42FF8098.2090001@gabo.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:13:16 +0000 Message-Id: <1124050396.5688.12.camel@linuxbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: ozk@atari.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de id j7EIFeKm017233 søn, 14,.08.2005 kl. 19.34 +0200, skrev Adam Kłobukowski: > Xaaes is slow. > > Machine: Falcon CT60 running 66MHz with 25MHz bus > > Software: > Kernel from CVS > Xaaes from CVS > Toswin from CVS > Naes 2.1 > > Kernel compilation time: (time make 040): > > - without aes (plain console): real: 10min, user: 9min, sys: 1min > - with Naes: real: 11min, user: 10min, sys: 1min > - with Xaaes: real: 51min, user: 47min, sys: 4min > > Same kernel in all cases. Same Toswin in Naes and Xaaes. Fresh kernel > sources in all cases. Same GCC, Make, name_unix_tool_here in all cases. > > Someone can tell me why kernel compilation under Xaaes is 5 times slower > than under Naes? > > Something seems to be very wrong here. Sounds terrible. What do you have in your autofolder? A complete list of everything you run would be nice. Best Regards Odd Skancke