From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Sun Aug 14 21:44:00 2005
X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Message-ID: <42FFA012.3020400@der-ingo.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:48:34 +0200
From: Ingo Schmidt <ich@der-ingo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: MiNT Mailing List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Xaaes is NOT slow
References: <42FF8098.2090001@gabo.pl> <1124050396.5688.12.camel@linuxbox> <42FF9114.4040906@gabo.pl> <42FF979F.3090601@gabo.pl>
In-Reply-To: <42FF979F.3090601@gabo.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: ich@der-ingo.de
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 RCVD_IN_DSBL
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi!

>Ok, Xaaes is not slow :)
>
>real: 11min, user 10min, sys 1min
>I'll try to track the app that makes problems.
>

Ah, I am not suprised! My experience with XaAES is, that it is a lot 
faster than anything else. However it still has a few glitches here and 
there. But it just takes a small email or note on ICQ to ozk and it gets 
fixed.

I dont use N.AES at all anymore. XaAES runs too fine to switch back to 
n.AES.

So whenever I read mails with subject "XaAES slow" I am very sceptical, 
I have to say...

Anyway, let us know which app is the offending one :-)

Cheers, Ingo =;->