From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Mon Sep  5 07:25:37 2005
X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
From: Janez Valant <jvalant@atari.org>
Organization: YesCREW
To: MiNT-List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Mint Bug?
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 07:22:12 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1
References: <1125871743.23405.23.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> <1468577531.20050905030526@der-ingo.de>
In-Reply-To: <1468577531.20050905030526@der-ingo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200509050722.12680.jvalant@atari.org>
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: jvalant@atari.org
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL,
 BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS
X-Spam-Level: **


> > So I ran a test.  It allocates 1 megabyte every 1 second, tells you if
> > the pointer is null or not, and then runs "free".
>
> Could u post the source code?
> I just wrote a little GFA program that does the same (I think) but I
> dont get this behaviour that you describe (Milan 060).
>
> To me it sounds really weird that MALLOC fails?!

  Hi,

  I recently also experienced odd MALLOC() behaviour. MALLOC in TOS (14Mb Ram) 
allocated all free ram, instead few hundred kilobytes... Don't know if its 
GFA or OS related problem...

  Janez