From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Sep 26 17:46:46 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:44:47 +0200 From: mikro To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: Re: [MiNT] some gem question Message-ID: <20050926154447.GA16530@hysteria.sk> References: <20050922132628.GA23269@hysteria.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: mikro@hysteria.sk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: > Dopendir/Dreaddir/Dclosedir or better use the POSIX interface from > the MiNTLib. MiNTLib also have the advantage to chck if these system > calls are available and automatically fall back to Fsfirst/Fsnext. These > system calls are supported by FreeMiNT, MagiC and some MetaDOS variants I > think. Under TOS you don't have a filesystem with long files anyway (so > Fsfirst/Fsnext are sufficient). > you mean that POSIX (opendir & co I guess) interface? Since I've tried that Dopendir() under TOS and I always get negative directory handle. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- MiKRO Atari XE/XL/Mega STE/Falcon060 http://mikro.atari.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------------