From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Mon Sep 5 11:49:52 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Subject: Re: [MiNT] Mint Bug? Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:45:48 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [MiNT] Mint Bug? Thread-Index: AcWx/dQwUcFjqE7dSzODQiJ87bs8egAAIjhQ From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2005 09:45:49.0798 (UTC) FILETIME=[99144860:01C5B1FE] X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: jan.thomas@bt.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Level: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de id j859nqZc020325 You could try changing your jumper on your memory card to 4mb instead of 14mb (if you have such a jumper) and try it again. Jan. > -----Original Message----- > From: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi > [mailto:mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi]On Behalf Of Patrice Mandin > Sent: 05 September 2005 10:39 > To: Mint list > Subject: Re: [MiNT] Mint Bug? > > > Le Sun, 04 Sep 2005 18:09:03 -0400 > Mark Duckworth a écrit: > > > So this is either a CT60 hardware problem since the same failure > > occurs on a completely different CT60 falcon, a > MiNT/Falcon/CT60 code > > bug (something that aranym wouldn't be using), or I'm just nuts. > > I think there is a problem with CT60. For example in Doom, renaming it > from .ttp to .prg makes it faster: > http://groups.google.fr/group/comp.sys.atari.st/search?hl=fr&g roup=comp.sys.atari.st&q=doom+ttp+prg+rename I think that either the memory/the program is not allocated in FastRam (and you have the same problem, binutils could only allocates 12 MB from ST-RAM). Maybe the program flags are not taken into account when CT60 is present. -- Patrice Mandin WWW: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/patrice.mandin/ Programmeur Linux, Atari Spécialité: Développement, jeux