From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Oct 21 11:57:54 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <4358BB0F.8000507@hysteria.sk> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:55:27 +0200 From: Miro Kropacek User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051011) X-Accept-Language: sk, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Mint list Subject: Re: [MiNT] Compiling with gcc: ld eats all ram References: <43566F18.9000405@shaw.ca> <1129738352.24801.6.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> <20051019183017.0d614e89.mandin.patrice@wanadoo.fr> <43575D24.3090909@hysteria.sk> <1129853355.25585.6.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> In-Reply-To: <1129853355.25585.6.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: mikro@hysteria.sk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: >If anyone with a lot of C experience wants to tackle porting a compiler, >the TCC compiler uses very little memory and compiles about 12 times >faster than GCC. > wow, this sounds really interesting. > >TCC is much easier to port than GCC, but of course, there is a lot of >Atari specific stuff you'd have to mess with. > > > for example? C compiler should be machine independent, shouldn't be? (I don't mean final output binary ofcourse). Or it was meaned it's x86 only compiler? I think this would be something we really need on atari, especially on unexpanded ones. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- MiKRO Atari XE/XL/Mega STE/Falcon060 http://mikro.atari.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------------