From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat Oct 29 21:48:33 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:44:59 +0200 From: Ingo Schmidt X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) Professional Reply-To: Ingo Schmidt X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <5010389630.20051029214459@der-ingo.de> To: MiNT-Liste Subject: [MiNT] Re[2]: Re[2]: Pexec mode 0 In-Reply-To: <4363B1AE.2020003@obta.uw.edu.pl> References: <629037063.20051028122318@der-ingo.de> <436228DA.6050304@obta.uw.edu.pl> <1641208225.20051028163355@der-ingo.de> <4363B1AE.2020003@obta.uw.edu.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: ich@der-ingo.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Hi Konrad! > I thought that you have a problem with reading C source code - you write > something like that - so I pointed you out the place where the problem comes from. Yes, thanks. But your mail looked a bit like: "Look, here it is, MiNT is right and there are evil programs and MiNT fixes them". And I was dead sure that there is a bug in mint and I was right after all :-) Anyway, thanks for directing me to the right bit in the code! One bug less in MiNT, we should all be happy :-) Cheers, Ingo =;->