From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Wed Nov 9 06:12:44 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <4371845F.10300@obta.uw.edu.pl> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 06:08:47 +0100 From: Konrad Kokoszkiewicz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Evan Langlois Cc: Odd Skancke , MiNT List Subject: Re: [MiNT] Tsetitimer() References: <436DD2D2.6090103@hysteria.sk> <436DE43C.2010900@obta.uw.edu.pl> <1131275978.5390.55.camel@linuxbox> <436DEB54.9020600@hysteria.sk> <1131290482.5390.81.camel@linuxbox> <11313 In-Reply-To: <1131322409.11016.61.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: draco@obta.uw.edu.pl Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: > After looking at the code, it looks like Talarm(), opcode 0x120, may > only have a granularity of seconds according to the comments in the > kernel, which isn't what the Compendium says. Could someone confirm? > It looks like there is a new call, Tmalarm(), opcode 0x13d, for > millisecond granularity. The Compendium is actually full of such mistakes, I don't see how anyone can regard it as a trustworthy documentation, if almost everything the Compendium says should be verified against Atari documentation and MiNT source code. KMK