From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Thu Dec 8 23:18:39 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Subject: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation From: Evan Langlois To: Arnaud BERCEGEAY Cc: MiNT List In-Reply-To: <4398ACDC.2020203@free.fr> References: <4397F4C3.7030701@utbm.fr> <1134035229.5776.50.camel@linuxbox> <4398098F.2010604@utbm.fr> <43988E5F.6000201@free.fr> <1134077315.29437.27.camel@linuxbox> <4398ACDC.2020203@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:15:34 -0600 Message-Id: <1134080134.19887.229.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc14.midphase.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - fishpool.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - CoolRunningConcepts.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_01, RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: * On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 22:59 +0100, Arnaud BERCEGEAY wrote: > My point is that the particular WM_REPOSED message (or 'extended' > WM_SIZED message) is not a 'window option', that's why i don't like that > much the usage of wind_set() for this particular feature. Extended? XaAES sends all window coordinates as part of WM_SIZED no matter what right? -- Evan