From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat Dec 10 17:58:57 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Message-ID: <1134233819.439b08db78e63@webmail1.utbm.fr> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:56:59 +0100 From: "olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr" To: mint@fishpool.com Subject: [MiNT] Trans.: Re: WM_REPOSED implementation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by portail1.utbm.fr id jBAGv4gf020485 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: * Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de id jBAGwtoi027622 ----- Message transféré de "olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr" ----- Date : Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:51:07 +0100 De : "olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr" Adresse de retour :"olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr" Sujet : Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation À : Odd Skancke Selon Odd Skancke : > lør, 10,.12.2005 kl. 16.47 +0100, skrev olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr: > > > > > > 3. Send WM_SIZED first, so that the WM_MOVED doesnt make a difference > > > when apps treat WM_SIZED 'correcly', and avoid configuration variable. > > > > > No you can't try Windom demo, and do it on dialog box in windows, it can't > work, > > as I already said, because if window is bigger than dialog box, after first > > WM_SIZER, Windom will change size to have correct size, then when WM_MOVED > > occur, it not look on size, and put value from gem message, so windows size > > will not resize it, and will be too large, so a part of window will not be > > redraw. > > Then I think we can conclude with the fact that XaAES's method work? Yes for me, I do the same at this time, with no implementation of WM_REPOSED, I don't know if I will implement or not this message, if I can't do better, I probably add it, if I can find better (with no trouble display (dual redraw at this time with some applications)), I don't know, but it's easy to do, in all case no compatibility trouble should appear. Wind_set(OPTS) is enough good for me, I will use it. regards Olivier > > > Olivier -- ----- Fin du message transféré ----- --